Considering an above ground pool, but I’m not sure if it’s the right option. What are the benefits and drawbacks of going above ground?
I was on the fence about this too when I started looking into pools, and I spent a lot of time comparing the two. We ended up going with an above-ground setup, and while it’s not perfect, it was definitely the right choice for us at the time.
The biggest upside?
Cost. It’s just way more affordable to install, especially if you’re not looking to spend tens of thousands right out of the gate. We got ours up and running in a weekend with a few friends helping out, no digging, no concrete, no heavy equipment. That alone made it doable when an in-ground pool just wasn’t in the cards.
Also, if you’re not totally sure how long you’ll be in your house or want something a little more flexible, it’s nice knowing an above-ground pool can be taken down or moved. It’s not exactly easy to move, but it’s a lot more possible than relocating a concrete in-ground one.
That said, there are a few trade-offs. Above-ground pools don’t blend into the yard the same way. Even with a deck around it, it still looks like a structure that was added on, not something built into the space. And you’re limited in terms of shape and depth, most are round or oval, and the depth is usually the same all the way across.
They can also require a little more work to keep the water temp comfortable, since they don’t have the insulation that the ground provides. And if you’ve got strong winds or storms in your area, you really have to keep an eye on the structure and cover.
All in all, for a lower upfront cost and a quicker setup, above-ground is a solid option. If you’re looking for something permanent and fully custom, then in-ground might make more sense. But for getting in the water and enjoying summer without breaking the bank, above-ground does the job.